|
''Daugherty v. Vanguard'' is one of a number of United States federal cases decided in the 2000s pertaining to the scope of allowable religious expression and/or activities in public schools. In the court’s summary judgment issued in September 2000, U.S. District Court Judge David McKeague ruled that Vanguard Charter Academy and its corporate parent, National Heritage Academies, did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution through its Moral Focus Curriculum.〔 ( School Law Reporter ) 〕 The case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan-Southern Division derives its name from plaintiff Megan Daugherty and four other parents who alleged in 1998 that their children were subjected to “Christian influences” while the children attended Vanguard Charter School Academy in Wyoming, Michigan. Judge McKeague ruled that the allegations were unfounded and granted summary judgment to Vanguard and its parent corporation.〔 (''Journal of Law and Education'' ) 〕 In the court’s 36-page opinion, Judge McKeague found that the school maintained a “correct posture of neutrality” regarding religious activities during school. The court granted the school and National Heritage Academies summary judgment, finding that the defendants “presented no more than a scintilla of evidence to support a finding that any constitutionally impermissible conduct occurred.” The ruling was not appealed by the defendants. The court’s opinion in ''Daugherty v. Vanguard'' is consistent with the U.S. Department of Education’s “Guidelines on Constitutionally Protected Prayer in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools".〔U.S. Department of Education, (''Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools'' ), February 7, 2003〕 ==Notes== 〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Daugherty v. Vanguard」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|